Joe Biden – Knox Democrats Sat, 09 Oct 2021 22:26:34 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Joe Biden – Knox Democrats 32 32 Joe Biden celebrates Indigenous Peoples Day by proclaiming Sat, 09 Oct 2021 20:43:00 +0000

President Biden issued a proclamation this week to mark Indigenous Peoples Day – the first time a US president has commemorated the holiday.

“On Indigenous Peoples Day, our nation celebrates the invaluable contributions and resilience of Indigenous peoples, recognizes their inherent sovereignty, and commits to honoring the federal government’s trust and treaty obligations to tribal nations.” Biden wrote in the proclamation on Friday. “Today, we recognize the resilience and strength of Indigenous peoples and the immeasurable positive impact they have had on all aspects of American society.”

The party has long been a favorite project of activists who accuse Christopher Columbus of genocide against the native American populations and vehemently oppose his namesake party.

Biden also marked Columbus Day on Friday, but – in an unusual move – included a lengthy exclusion for his critics in his statement.

President Joe Biden and Home Secretary Deb Haaland participate in a signing ceremony to restore and protect three national monuments on October 8, 2021.
Pacific Coast News / Shawn Thew – Pool via CNP

“Today we also recognize the painful history of the wrongs and atrocities that many European explorers inflicted on tribal nations and indigenous communities,” Biden said. “For Native Americans, Western exploration has ushered in a wave of devastation: violence against indigenous communities, displacement and theft of tribal homelands, introduction and spread of disease, and so on.

Source link

]]> 0
Biden is the first president to mark Indigenous Peoples Day Fri, 08 Oct 2021 15:24:10 +0000


President Joe Biden talks about COVID-19 vaccinations after visiting a Clayco Corporation construction site for a Microsoft data center in Elk Grove Village, Ill. On Thursday, October 7, 2021. (AP Photo / Susan Walsh )

WASHINGTON (AP) – President Joe Biden issued the first-ever presidential proclamation of Indigenous Peoples Day on Friday, providing the most significant impetus to date in efforts to refocus the federal holiday celebrating Christopher Columbus towards a peoples appreciation indigenous.

Biden also issued a Columbus Day proclamation on Monday, October 11, which is established by Congress.

“For generations, federal policies have systematically sought to assimilate and displace Indigenous peoples and eradicate Indigenous cultures,” Biden wrote in the proclamation of Indigenous Peoples Day. “Today, we recognize the resilience and strength of Indigenous peoples and the immeasurable positive impact they have had on all aspects of American society.”

In a separate Columbus Day proclamation, Biden praised the role of Italian Americans in American society, but also referred to the violence and damage that Columbus and other explorers of the day wrought on the Americas. .

“Today we also recognize the painful history of the wrongs and atrocities that many European explorers inflicted on tribal nations and indigenous communities,” Biden wrote. “It is a measure of our greatness as a nation that we do not seek to bury these shameful episodes from our past – that we face them honestly, that we bring them to light and do all we can to remedy them. “

It is a break with President Donald Trump’s ardent defense of “fearless heroes” like Columbus in his proclamation of the holiday in 2020.

“Sadly, in recent years radical activists have sought to undermine the legacy of Christopher Columbus,” Trump said at the time. “These extremists seek to replace discussion of his vast contributions with discussions of his failures, his discoveries with atrocities, and his accomplishments with transgressions. “

Source link

]]> 0
Disciplined Democrats Should Adopt Joe Biden’s National Platform Thu, 07 Oct 2021 14:39:15 +0000

IF PERCEPTION IS a construction of language, as an American anthropologist by the name of Benjamin Lee Whorf explained, how Joe Biden’s party must regret the expression “Democrats in disarray”. Since it first appeared in local newspapers in the 1960s, reporters have used the term alliterative whenever Democrats quarreled with each other – whether existentially, such as during their desert years of the 1980s. ; or in the normal course of seeking consensus among their many parts. Reading the New York Times The website finds Democrats in deep disarray during the 1992 presidential primary, shortly before Bill Clinton’s nomination, and just after the 2006 midterms, in which they became the first party to control the House and Senate for over a decade.

Their recent performance on the Hill – to which the epithet has also been applied – might sound more deserving. After Senate Democrats struck an impressive bipartisan infrastructure deal, the party’s slightly larger majority in the House failed to pass it. Leftists insisted the bill had to go hand in hand with a partisan budget bill, containing billions of dollars in climate and social spending that had made some moderates nauseous. Together, the bills represent most of Joe Biden’s domestic policy ambitions. Yet Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the Democratic House, was forced to put them aside.

For Representative Josh Gottheimer, this was a case of his party’s “far left” employing “Freedom Caucus tactics” to “destroy the president’s agenda.” Strong stuff, which must have resonated with the many Conservative voters of Mr. Gottheimer (he became in 2017 the first Democrat to win his district of New Jersey since 1933). Yet it was incorrect. The content of the budget package is also on Mr Biden’s agenda. Exploiting both bills, as the president himself later acknowledged, has made it more likely that both will eventually pass. Moreover, far from mimicking Republican Freedom Caucus headbangers, House leftists, led by Washington’s Pramila Jayapal, have suggested they will make whatever compromises are necessary.

Early in this process, the left demanded that the budget bill contain $ 6 billion in tax cuts and largely unfunded spending. After the moderates opposed, it fell to $ 3.5 billion, paid for in tax hikes and spread over a decade. Most Democrats were happy with it. But among a handful of dissenters, Senator Joe Manchin, conservative and opponent of ambitious climate change policy, said he could not tolerate a package costing more than $ 1.5 billion. Ms Jayapal suggested this week that she would settle for $ 2.5 billion, and Mr Manchin, a die-hard wheel dealer, that he was “not ruling anything out.” Without underestimating the difficulties the party still faces in trying to push its agenda forward, it looks less like a real crisis than the cutting and pushing of legislation.

This is something, as the infrastructure agreement briefly recalled, that the parties used to do together. The idea was that by winning enough sensitive people on the other side, the ruling party could make its own radicals irrelevant. So the fact that Democrats now have no choice but to go it alone on climate change and other big issues that inactive Republicans ignore has therefore given party extremists a bigger voice. Especially given its tiny majorities: To pass the finance bill, Democrats can only afford to lose three caucus votes in the House and none in the Senate. Yet the intra-party struggle this has brought about distracts attention from yet another big change. Democrats are mostly unanimous.

According to the FiveThirtyEight site score, the House Democrats are the most unified caucus of the last three conventions; 203 of their 223 members voted with Mr. Biden 100% of the time. So, by the way, has M. Manchin. There are several reasons for this strange complicity.

For lack of a central credo – the kind Republicans once found in conservatism and now find in Donald Trump – Democrats are more of a collaboration of interest groups. Hence their periodic quarrel. Yet in recent years they have become less ideologically diverse, especially in economic policy, on which they have reached an interventionist consensus. Moderates and leftists still disagree – often wildly – on the details. Yet Mr. Biden, the center of gravity made flesh, has set parameters in which the two appear to be able to live. In last year’s primary, leftists talked about abolishing private health insurance. Their current feud with Manchin over renewable energy incentives seems limited by comparison.

It is less a testament to Mr Biden’s authority (which has been tested in recent weeks as his ratings have plummeted) than to the fact that all Democrats are eager to rule. The party base expects this; no Democrats were elected on the promise of torpedoing their platform like members of the right-wing Freedom Caucus were. Even the most ardent leftists have therefore finally shown themselves ready for compromise. And the specter of Mr. Trump – whose rise of Democrats often attributes to failures of the system of government for many years – makes this pattern even more likely to endure. “We will get there,” Jayapal assured your columnist, when asked if she would be willing under any circumstances to let the bills fail. Even with so little slippage, it still seems the most likely outcome.

Government salary

Whether such a victory improves Mr. Biden’s miserable grades is quite another matter. Among the many depressing truths lurking in political science books is the fact that voters mostly ignore a government’s legislative record. Elections are decided by the emotions and fundamentals of the tribe, not by child tax credits. Increasingly tribal Republicans – who did not issue any manifestos until the last election – have taken this into account. By comparison, it’s good that Democrats are still ignoring it.

For more information on Joe Biden’s presidency, visit our dedicated hub

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the title “Democratic Discipline”

Source link

]]> 0
Joe Biden and Xi Jinping to hold virtual meeting this year – White House | China Thu, 07 Oct 2021 03:05:24 +0000

US President Joe Biden and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping plan to meet by video link before the end of the year, a senior US official said on Wednesday.

There is an “agreement in principle” for the “virtual bilateral”, the official told reporters on condition of anonymity.

The virtual meeting was announced after US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan met with China’s top diplomat Yang Jiechi in the Swiss city of Zurich during six-hour talks aimed at improving communication between the two. country.

The closed-door meeting at an airport hotel was the couple’s first face-to-face meeting since an unusually public broadcast of grievances in Alaska in March.

U.S. officials had suggested the meeting followed Biden’s September 9 call with Xi, before which the world’s two largest economies appeared to be at a stalemate.

Sullivan’s trip continues an increase in contacts between Beijing and Washington, as Biden argues for the establishment of “safeguards” for the growing struggle between the two powers.

Tension is mounting over China’s aggressive stance towards Taiwan, the US decision to sell nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, trade disputes and human rights violations against Uyghurs in Xinjiang.

The White House said Sullivan raised concerns at the meeting about China’s actions in the South China Sea, as well as human rights and Beijing’s positions on Hong Kong, Xinjiang and Taiwan. .

Beijing and Washington both said the talks were constructive and frank. The US side said the tone was very different from that of Alaska.

Early speculation had been that Biden and Xi might meet in person at the G20 summit in Italy in October, but Xi has not left China since the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic early last year and has not should not attend the summit in Rome or the UN. climate conference in Glasgow.

“Today’s conversation, in general, was a more meaningful and substantial engagement than what we have had to date below the leadership level,” the US official said, adding that Washington hoped that it would be a “model for future meetings”.

The official said, however, that this should not be seen as a thaw in relations.

“What we are trying to achieve is a stable state between the United States and China where we are able to compete intensely but manage this competition responsibly,” said the official.

China’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement that Yang told Sullivan the confrontation would harm both countries and the world.

“The two parties have agreed to take measures (…) to strengthen strategic communication, properly manage differences, avoid conflicts and confrontations,” the ministry statement said.

Biden’s call with Xi in September ended a nearly seven-month gap in direct communication between the leaders, and the two discussed the need to ensure that their competition does not come into conflict.

The tension in US-China relations has been exacerbated recently by the Chinese military, which has carried out dozens of sorties near the autonomous island of Taiwan, which Beijing considers part of its territory.

Biden said on Tuesday that he had spoken to Xi about Taiwan and that they had agreed to abide by the “Taiwan agreement”.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Wednesday reiterated his concerns that Beijing is undermining regional peace and stability with its “provocative” action.

“We strongly urge Beijing to end its military, diplomatic and economic pressure and coercion directed against Taiwan,” said Blinken, who was in Paris for talks with French officials.

Reuters, Associated Press and Agence France-Presse contributed to this report

Source link

]]> 0 Joe Biden’s ethically contested presidency Wed, 06 Oct 2021 17:30:50 +0000

It’s worse coming from the man who campaigned for the job insisting he stood up for “honor and telling the truth”.

(Doug Mills | The New York Times) President Joe Biden delivers remarks from the White House in Washington, August 31, 2021. We can no longer accept his “word as Biden,” New York Times columnist Bret Stephens .

There is little doubt that President Joe Biden was not telling the truth when, days after the Taliban victory, he told ABC News that his top military advisers had not urged him to keep some 2,500 troops in. Afghanistan. The president’s claim was flatly contradicted last week in sworn testimony from General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and General Kenneth McKenzie Jr., chief of the US Central Command.

During the generals’ testimony, White House press secretary Jen Psaki sought to defend her boss by pointing to a line from Biden’s interview in which he appeared to suggest that military advice ” were shared ”.

Another huge one. What split? As Helene Cooper, Eric Schmitt and David Sanger of The Times reported in April, just after Lloyd Austin was sworn in as defense secretary in January, he and his top generals “were on lockdown to recommend that ‘about 3,000 to 4,500 troops remain in Afghanistan. When asked if there were any senior military advisers who argued otherwise, Psaki ducked the question.

Biden’s cover-up, regarding the worst major foreign policy decision executed in years, would be an outrage in any presidency. It’s worse coming from the man who campaigned for the job insisting he stood up for “honor and telling the truth”.

A week earlier, Politico’s Ben Schreckinger had published a scrupulously reported book on the Biden family. This convincingly proves that some of the most explosive emails from Hunter Biden’s purported laptop were entirely genuine – a claim that Schreckinger confirmed with multiple sources, including a Swedish government agency, and which has never been explicitly denied by Hunter himself.

This includes an email from 2017 in which one of Hunter’s potential business partners offered a “tentative deal” with now-defunct CEFC China Energy to share percentages of ownership in a new venture, with “10 Jim “and” 10 held by H for the big boy? ” Jim Biden is the president’s brother. “The big guy,” according to Tony Bobulinski, an email recipient, is Hunter’s father.

This does not mean that the President received, or even expected to receive, money from this alleged company, or even that he was aware of it.

But it gives good reason to believe that the media gave way too much credit to his claim that the leaked emails were “a Russian plant,” as he put it during his second debate with Donald Trump. It’s harder to ignore Bobulinski’s claim that he met Joe, Jim and Hunter Biden in May 2017 to discuss the general terms of the deal. And it is worth considering whether the president may have been willing to be of service to his family, even if he did not personally or directly benefit from their dealings.

“The Bidens pride themselves on their integrity and like to promise ‘my word as Biden’ when they really mean something,” Schreckinger writes. “The evidence gathered in the last few weeks of the campaign is based on an image in which those close to Joe regularly exchange about their ties to him, while the separation between their private relationships and his public duties is not as wide as he claimed it. “

It would all be bad enough if it was just history. But what are we to make of Hunter’s recent adventure as a visual artist – an area in which he has no formal training and no business experience?

In case you missed it: A gallery owner in SoHo intends to sell 15 works by Hunter for prices of up to $ 500,000 each. To protect property from these transactions, the White House has issued “ethical guidelines” that are supposed to keep things above all else. hidden the identity of the buyers of Hunter and the White House. And it is up to the gallery owner – that is, the person who stands to gain from the commissions – to control the guidelines by rejecting suspicious lucrative offers.

It screams scam. “The Treasury Department warned last year that the anonymity of high-value art transactions could make the market attractive to those who engage in illegal financial activities or to those subject to US sanctions,” he said. Zolan Kanno-Youngs reported from The Times in July.

In another report of questionable activities, Mattathias Schwartz wrote in Business Insider about emails indicating that in 2015, while his father was vice president, Hunter allegedly explored a “success fee” deal of more than $ 2. million dollars with two Democratic donors to help recover Libya. assets frozen following US sanctions. The effort came to nothing – Hunter’s reputation for difficult life didn’t help – but at least one of the donors was drawn to Hunter’s offer because he is “the son of the n ° 2 who has a dossier on Libya ”.

“When it comes to opening doors in Washington,” Schwartz notes, “the illusion of access can be as valuable as hard currency.”

Some readers may be inclined to dismiss this as a simple indictment of a troubled son. They might wonder what conclusions they would draw if it was, say, Eric Trump. Some readers will also think that it is not the president’s job to watch over his adult son. But he is his job to ensure that Hunter and other members of his family do not take advantage of his position in government.

It would be corruption. The president will have to do better than give us his “Biden word” that he will end it.

Bret Stephens | The New York Times, (Tony Cenicola / The New York Times)

Bret stephens is a columnist for The New York Times.

Source link

]]> 0
Michigan Trump supporters line the streets chanting “F *** Joe Biden” Wed, 06 Oct 2021 02:11:47 +0000

RResidents wearing MAGA clothing in Howell, Mich., Gave President Joe Biden a rude awakening on Tuesday.

“F *** Joe Biden,” could be heard in the crowd as the President’s motorcade passed. A member of the crowd was even seen giving a middle finger as the car passed.


“We people are pissed off,” read a sign held by a woman.

Biden traveled to Howell to visit the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 324 Training Center in Howell before speaking to a crowd about restoring America’s infrastructure through its multibillion-dollar infrastructure legislation. dollars, reported the Detroit Free Press.

“This is a blue collar model on how we restore America’s pride,” Biden told the crowd. “Other countries are accelerating and we are falling behind. We need to pick up the pace.”


“The challenge of the day is economic competition. Let’s learn from this story. Not because it was perfect – because Americans then did what we need to do now: invest in ourselves to show the world that the American democracy works, ”Biden continued. .

Washington Examiner Videos

Key words: News, Joe Biden, Michigan, President Trump

Original author: Matthew Miller

Original location: Michigan Trump supporters line the streets chanting “F *** Joe Biden”

Source link

]]> 0
Biden’s legality to write off $ 50,000 in student debt no update Tue, 05 Oct 2021 14:14:35 +0000
  • Jen Psaki said there was no update on Biden’s legality to write off $ 50,000 in student debt per borrower.
  • It’s been over six months since Biden asked the education and justice departments. to review its legality.
  • Psaki said Biden would sign a bill to write off $ 10,000 in student debt – the amount he campaigned on.

President Joe Biden has campaigned for the cancellation of $ 10,000 in student debt per borrower, but some Democrats, led by Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, want him to write off $ 50,000 per borrower via executive action – this that the president was not sure he had the power to do.

That’s why the education and justice departments have examined his legal capacity to do so, but White House press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters on Monday that there was still no update on these reviews. It’s been over six months.

“I have no further update,” Psaki said at the press conference. “I would say that, obviously, reducing the cost of college education or alleviating student debt is a priority for this president and vice-president.”

In February, Psaki said Biden would ask the Justice Department to review its power to use executive action to write off student debt, but it is not clear exactly when the Department began this review. However, White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain told Politico in April that Biden also asked Education Secretary Miguel Cardona to create a note on the president’s legal authority to overturn 50 $ 000 in student loans per person.

He said Biden “hasn’t made a decision on this anyway, and, in fact, has yet to receive the notes he needs to start focusing on this decision.”

But Psaki on Monday did not comment on the reason for what could delay those ratings, and she said if Congress passed a bill to write off $ 10,000 in student debt per borrower, Biden would be “happy to sign it.” .

However, $ 10,000 is significantly less than what Warren and many borrowers want, and Warren told reporters during a press call in February that following the legislative route would take too long.

“We have a lot to do, including moving to infrastructure and all kinds of other stuff,” Warren said. “I have legislation to do it, but for me that is just not a reason to wait. The president can do it, and I really hope he will.”

Millions of Americans will have to start repaying their collective $ 1.7 trillion debt again in February, after the payment hiatus is lifted. After a third major student loan company, Navient, announced it would shut down its services, Warren told Insider the best thing that can happen to borrowers before payments restart is a large forgiveness of student debt.

“At the end of the day, the student loan system is broken,” Warren said. “The only way to ensure that borrowers don’t face the same predatory behavior from Navient’s replacement is to write off student debt, so that no borrower is held hostage by companies profiting from their financial distress. . “

Source link

]]> 0 Biden Says Debt Limit Must Be Raised Due to Trump’s “Reckless” Policies – Live | US News Mon, 04 Oct 2021 20:11:02 +0000

Louisiana’s American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) called on Biden administration to shut down further proliferation of the petrochemical industry in the so-called “Cancer Alley”, adding to growing calls among advocacy groups in the region for a moratorium on new polluting factories.

The heavily industrialized region between New Orleans and Baton Rouge is lined with more than 100 factories, producing the most polluted air in America. According to data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), some census tracts in St John the Baptist Parish have the highest risk of cancer from air pollution in the United States – more than 50 times the national average.

Joe Biden put the region at the center of his environmental justice policy platform during the 2020 election and referred to “Cancer Alley” when signing new climate ordinances in February.

But activists continued to urge the president to take targeted action to reduce toxic emissions and end construction of new factories. In August, the administration suspended construction of a gargantuan plastic complex project in the parish of St James, which would emit a range of carcinogenic pollutants and emit 13 million tonnes of greenhouse gases per year, the equivalent of three coal-fired power stations.

Local organizers have long urged the EPA to regulate emissions of chloroprene, a cancer-causing pollutant, emitted by a synthetic rubber plant, Pontchartrain Works, for more than half a century to dangerous levels.

Cancer Alley is also an area once littered with plantations once dependent on slave labor.

ACLU Louisiana Executive Director Alanah Odoms referred to the story in a video message on Monday.

“This sacred land should legally belong to the descendants of black men, women and children who labored until their death as slaves,” Odoms said.

“Instead, the earth has been mined by dangerous plastic and chemical factories that have destroyed air quality, accelerated climate change, and exposed descendants to unreasonable rates of disease and cancer. The Biden administration has a duty to intervene. “

The region was also severely affected by Hurricane Ida in August. Activists from St John the Baptist Parish and St James Parish suffered extensive damage to their homes.


Source link

]]> 0
Can Democrats Hold Together? Biden’s agenda depends on it Mon, 04 Oct 2021 04:41:19 +0000

WASHINGTON (AP) – This is one of the favorite sayings of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a guide for Democrats in these difficult times: “Our diversity is our strength. Our unity is our power.

But as Democrats try to squeeze President Joe Biden’s sweeping federal government overhaul into law, it’s the diversity of progressive and conservative views of the party that separates them.

And it is only by remaining united that their voiceless majority in reserve have any hope of making their reconstruction program law.

Biden to travel to Michigan on Tuesday to speak directly to the American people about his vision: It’s time to tax big corporations and the rich and invest that money in child care, health care, education and tackling climate change – what he sees as the one of the country’s most urgent priorities.

Together, Biden, Pelosi and other Democrats enter a very uncertain time, the messy throes of legislation, in what will now be a longer-term pursuit that could span weeks, if not months, of negotiations. .

“Let me tell you about negotiation: in the end, that’s when you really have to weigh in,” Pelosi said recently. “You can’t tire yourself. You cannot concede.

“This,” she added on a day when negotiations stretched out until midnight, “that’s the fun part.”

The product – or the colossal failure to reach a deal – will define not only Biden’s first year as president, but the legacy of Pelosi and a generation of congressional lawmakers, with ramifications for the mid-election. – mandate for next year. At stake is not only the reduced $ 3.5 trillion plan, but also the slimmer $ 1000 billion public works bill that is now stalled, inextricably tied to the bigger bill.

As Democrats in Congress regroup, after exceeding Friday’s deadline imposed by Pelosi for passing a law in the House in the middle of a bitter finger, they now face a new one, Oct.31, to make gains on Biden’s big plans. $ 3.5 trillion package down to roughly $ 2 trillion, and final approval of the $ 1,000 billion Senate public works bill pending, for now.

Attention remains squarely focused on two key points, Senator Joe Manchin and Senator Kyrsten Sinema, who, along with a small group of conservative House Democrats, are the backbone of any deal.

Biden is expected to be in touch with the return of senators Monday in Washington. Pelosi had conversations with Manchin in West Virginia and Sinema in Arizona.

“The president wants both bills and he expects to get both bills,” Biden adviser Cedric Richmond said on Fox News Sunday. “We will continue to work on both.

The failure to convince Manchin and Sinema to support Biden’s larger vision contributed to the collapse last week of a promised House vote on their favorite $ 1,000 billion public works bill, that they had negotiated with Biden.

Spirits flared and accusations flew over who was to blame. Progressives lambasted the two senators for delaying Biden’s grand agenda; the centrists criticized Pelosi for going back on the promised vote; and progressives were both praised and berated for playing hard, refusing to vote on the public works bill to force a broader agreement.

In the end, Biden arrived on Capitol Hill late Friday afternoon to deliver a message of hard love to them – telling the centrists they wouldn’t get their vote on the bipartisan deal he helped negotiate Until progressives made a commitment on the larger package and warning progressives the price of a big bill would probably be around $ 2 trillion.

In many ways, the weeks ahead are reminiscent of the Democrats’ last major legislative endeavor to push the Affordable Care Act to the finish line during the Obama administration.

No one doubts Pelosi – and Biden – can do it again. But the fight that awaits us will certainly be politically painful.

Without the support of Republicans who mock Biden’s vision as a great socialist-style government, Democrats must decide among themselves what size of the package can win the support of the 50-50 Senate and the Restricted House.

Paid by raising taxes for corporations and the wealthy, those people earning more than $ 400,000 a year, or $ 450,000 for couples, the measure, Biden insists, will have an overall price of “zero.”

Yet private talks about cutting various programs have now deepened conversations about wholesale cuts that may need to be made. Everything is on the table.

For example, will Senator Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Push to expand Medicare to include dental, vision and other health care benefits survive? Or will these benefits have to be removed or reduced?

What about new child care subsidies or COVID-19 related tax credits for families with children – can these last for several years or will they need to be reduced to a few? -one only?

Will the free community college be accessible to everyone, or only to low-income people, as Manchin is proposing?

Can Biden’s efforts to tackle climate change be extended beyond the money already approved for electric vehicles and weatherproof buildings in the Public Works Bill?

“What we’ve said from the start is that it was never about price. This is what we want to deliver, ”Representative Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., Leader of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said in an interview on CNN on Sunday.

“The president told us that too. He said not to start with the number. Start with what you’re for, ”she says.

Pelosi worked over the phone to win over Manchin and Sinema, who in many ways are outliers among more progressive-leaning House and Senate Democrats.

The importance of the two senators has turned beyond the ring road into popular culture – Sinema was mocked on “Saturday Night Live” this weekend, as a flotilla of kayak activists recently invaded the barge in Manchin DC.

Pelosi and Sinema had a thorny relationship when Arizonan first joined Congress, but they now share a common interest in tackling climate change.

Manchin and Pelosi have a warmer alliance, and she showered the senator with praise as someone with whom she shared the values ​​of Italian-Americans and Roman Catholics. “We’re friends,” she said.

But Pelosi made it clear that she was ready to fight to the end for a bill she called “the highlight of my service in Congress.”

At a private caucus meeting last week, when a lawmaker suggested she had gone back on her promise to pass the infrastructure vote, she said that was before some of them walked away. Join Senators in rejecting Biden’s broader plan, according to a person who requested anonymity to recount his private comments.

“Let’s at least try to stay together,” Pelosi pleaded with Democrats.

Source link

]]> 0
Joe Biden: US unites 30 countries to end “illicit use of cryptocurrency” – Bitcoin News Sun, 03 Oct 2021 15:26:25 +0000

President Joe Biden has said the United States will unite 30 countries to end “the illicit use of cryptocurrency.” The United States “is partnering closely with countries around the world” to respond to cybersecurity threats, Biden added.

US to unite 30 countries to fight crypto misuse, says Biden

The White House released a statement from President Joe Biden on the government’s cybersecurity efforts on Friday, with October being Cyber ​​Security Awareness Month.

President Biden explained that the United States “partners closely with countries around the world” to respond to cybersecurity threats, “including our NATO allies and our G7 partners.” He added that this month:

The United States will bring together 30 countries to accelerate our cooperation in the fight against cybercrime, improving collaboration between law enforcement agencies, containing the illicit use of cryptocurrency and diplomatic engagement on these issues.

“The federal government needs the partnership of every American and every American business in these efforts. We need to lock down our digital doors – by encrypting our data and using multi-factor authentication, for example – and we need to create secure technology by design, allowing consumers to understand the risks associated with the technologies they buy, ”a Biden continued.

The US President said: “I am committed to strengthening our cybersecurity by strengthening our critical infrastructure against cyber attacks, disrupting ransomware networks, working to establish and promote clear rules of the road for all nations in the world. cyberspace, and making it clear that we will hold accountable those who threaten our security.

The Biden administration has stepped up its efforts to fight ransomware. In September, the US Treasury Department announced “a package of actions aimed at disrupting criminal networks and virtual currency exchanges responsible for ransom laundering” as part of the whole-of-government effort to fight ransomware.

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) said in June that in many cases cryptocurrencies “are used to facilitate money laundering, ransomware attacks and other financial crimes.”

What do you think of President Joe Biden’s efforts to stop “the illicit use of cryptocurrency”? Let us know in the comments section below.

Image credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. This is not a direct offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, nor a recommendation or endorsement of any product, service or business. does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or allegedly caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, good or service mentioned in this article.

Source link

]]> 0