Knox Democrats Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:18:01 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Knox Democrats 32 32 Who is responsible for cutting Joe Biden? Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:59:30 +0000

President Joe Biden speaks about infrastructure at the Flatirons Campus of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory on September 14, 2021, in Arvanda, Colo. (AP Photo / Evan Vucci)

It was one of those C-SPAN moments. Antony Blinken, Secretary of State, stands before a Senate committee once again trying to explain Afghanistan, when Idaho Senator Jim Risch asked who was responsible for the job of cutting audio from Joe Biden. Blinken sounded confused and said there was no one whose job it was to cut Joe Biden’s audio.

“Are you telling this committee that this doesn’t happen – that there’s no one in the White House pushing a button and interrupting it in the middle of a sentence?” asked Risch.

It’s correct.

The senator was referring to Biden’s appearance with firefighters in Idaho where he posed for a photoshoot, spoke about global warming, and then said he wanted to ask the firefighters a question.

“Can I ask you a question? One of the things I have worked on with others is…”

And the sound stops.

Senator Risch couldn’t believe Blinken didn’t know:

“Are you telling us you didn’t know anything about it?” asked Risch. “Someone interrupt him in the middle of a sentence?” Is that what you are trying to tell this committee? “

The senator said this also happened last March after Biden’s opening remarks at a House Democratic caucus meeting, just as he said he was happy to answer questions.

“I’m happy to answer questions if that’s what I’m supposed to do next. Whatever you want me to do,… ”said Biden.

To cut!

Now I know a lot about cutting my sound off. As a journalist, it was done to me. I’ll have my machine plugged into the media stream of a speech, and you still keep rolling past the end, hoping to get that mike moment open, but the audio guy interrupts it.

And that’s exactly what the White House is doing with Biden. As for the private part, they cut the audio.

So, yes, it is a trivial matter, but I share Senator Risch’s frustration. And he was really frustrated.

“His sentence was cut in the middle of his sentence,” Risch exclaimed.

Yes it was. But let’s look at the bright side: it’s actually a bipartisan moment. See, I listen to A LOT of Joe Biden on C-SPAN – he can go on forever. A lot of people wish there was someone to mute the audio. And yet, here is a conservative Republican who really wants to know more. He wants to hear more Joe!

So I think the White House should just start broadcasting whatever Joe says. Frankly, I would check in every president 24/7. We were doing that. This is how we know LBJ stayed in Vietnam just to save face. That’s how we know Nixon was a crook. There is no debate – everything is recorded.

If we had recorded Presidents 24/7, it would have been much easier to find out who screwed up Afghanistan and who caused January 6. And Bob Woodward could write his books in half the time.

Listen to Seattle’s Morning News weekday mornings from 5 a.m. to 9 a.m. on KIRO Radio, 97.3 FM. Subscribe to podcast here.

Source link

]]> 0
Colorado Republican Central Committee Should Keep Primary, Drop Plots Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:00:37 +0000

Despite the potential for Colorado Republicans to win in 2022, a group of self-proclaimed “principled” Republican activists are determined to embroil the party in stolen electoral conspiracy theories and alienate the 1.6 million uninvited voters. affiliates who represent 43% of the electorate.

Which is a shame given that Democrats have left the political door wide open for Republican victories.

President Joe Biden’s confused incompetence catches up with the tragic human disasters in Afghanistan and on the southern border. Inflation is on the rise as a result of rampant federal spending. Crime is skyrocketing across the country as Democratic majorities in Congress, including American senses Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper, curl up in fear of a demented left that seeks to fund the police and pamper criminals.

Here in Colorado, Governor Jared Polis shamefully allowed our Colorado State Capitol to be vandalized night after night by rioters without any comment from him for days let alone any effort to protect this historic building. Polis presided over the gross negligence of his health department which, according to a Colorado Public Radio investigation, likely resulted in hundreds of preventable care home deaths from COVID-19. Meanwhile, the Department of Labor and Employment was a bureaucratic mess when tens of thousands of Coloradans needed to access their unemployment benefits due to COVID shutdowns. Crime is rampant in the Denver subway, and homeless camps are taking over sidewalks and parks.

Republicans are virtually unanimous in supporting President Donald Trump’s consequential achievements such as historic tax cuts and deregulation that have spurred massive economic growth; make more than 200 conservative judicial appointments – including three to the United States Supreme Court – that will impact the federal justice system for decades; and finally to gain control of illegal immigration at the southern border.

But Trump squandered that record of achievement by refusing to accept defeat, fanning the flames of stolen electoral conspiracy theories, and his shameful behavior in the Jan.6 attack on the United States Capitol.

Sadly, a large number of Republican activists across the state are more interested in fighting the 2020 presidential election than they claim to have been stolen. They refuse to accept the fact that former President Donald Trump lost not because of voter fraud, but because of his own actions and words which alienated many voters who voted for him in 2016.

Trump increased his percentage of Hispanic and black voters across the country, but those numbers were more than offset by the hemorrhaging of voters in previously Republican suburbs, including here in Colorado.

These Republican activists embrace the ever-evolving conspiracy theories that cross the political horizon to be discredited until the next one can be brought up.

Many of them are convinced the election was stolen from Trump here in Colorado despite public polls showing his disapproval rating was in his 50s and he lost the state by 14 points. And he was strongly hated by the hundreds of thousands of new voters, largely young and unaffiliated, who have moved here over the past decade.

Now, the Republican State of Colorado Central Committee will vote on Sept. 18 on whether or not to cancel the 2022 Republican primary elections and give a few thousand activists the power to nominate Republican candidates in caucuses and national assemblies. uncrowded party rather than in primary elections where hundreds of thousands vote for party candidates.

Unaffiliated voters have exploded in recent years and now represent 43% of the electorate while Democrats have 29% and Republicans only 26%. If Colorado Republicans cancel the primary election, 1.6 million unaffiliated voters will not receive a Democratic ballot until the 2022 primary.

Restricting the ability of 1.6 million unaffiliated voters to vote in the Republican primary, let alone 1 million Republicans who will not attend party caucuses, is not the way to build a campaign that can win general elections.

When Wayne Allard, then a congressman, asked me to manage his campaign for the US Senate in 1996, he said something very clear:

“I don’t want to be just the Republican candidate. I want to be the next US Senator from Colorado. Everything we do and say to win the primary must be done with the goal of attracting the unaffiliated voters that we will need to win the general election, otherwise the nomination is not worth the effort.

Allard was clearly the underdog of the Republican nomination against a respected attorney general. After winning that primary, Colorado Democrats dismissed the Loveland vet as a definite loser to the powerful and wealthy Denver 17th Street lawyer-lobbyist who would spend more than Allard in the general election.

Contrary to what some conservative activists today seem to think, it was not easy to win a prominent position statewide, even then. When Allard ran in 1996, Colorado Republicans had lost 11 of 14 governor and senatorial elections between 1972 and 1994. Only US Senator Bill Armstrong in 1978 and 1984 and US Senator Hank Brown in 1990 won. that time.

But Allard ran on a traditional Republican agenda to reduce tax and regulatory burdens on families and small businesses, balance the federal budget, and return power to state and local governments, a program that would attract, rather than repel. , the very unaffiliated. voters we needed to win. And we contrasted very aggressively the personal antecedents of the two candidates, “the vet versus the lobbyist”.

Two years later, in 1998, state treasurer Bill Owens adopted the Allard model and broke the Democratic six-game winning streak for governor by also crafting an effective program to cut taxes, reform the education and improve transport. Owens won a tough primary over a respected state Senate president and became the first Republican governor to be elected in 28 years. He remains the only Republican governor for the past 50 years.

Allard and Owens were re-elected in 2002, but since then Republicans have lost 9 of 10 elections for governor and senator, the lone winner being U.S. Senator Cory Gardner who toppled Democratic incumbent Mark Udall in 2014. Gardner has been overthrown in 2020 in Trump’s anti-landslide.

Several of those nine elections were highly winnable, but the Republican candidates failed by waging an unruly campaign that made politically fatal mistakes, or waging a narrow ideological campaign that pushed out unaffiliated voters, or by failing to set an agenda. clear and dominant conservative who could win a primary. and a general election.

Not once in the 19 years that I worked for United States Senator Bill Armstrong, United States Senator Hank Brown, United States Senator Wayne Allard, and Governor Bill Owens have I heard any of them say hitting the chest as morally superior or declaring themselves “in principle” while attacking other Republicans as unworthy if they disagreed on certain issues.

They understood that politics is the art of addition, not of subtraction. They didn’t need to boast of being “principled”. They have shown it every day during their campaigns and in the way they have served their state and nation in power.

Conspiracy theories and restricted access to the nomination process are sure losers for Colorado Republicans in 2022.

Dick Wadhams is a former President of the Republican State of Colorado who worked for American Senses Bill Armstrong, Hank Brown, Wayne Allard, and Governor Bill Owens.

To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit it online or see our guidelines for how to submit by email or post.

Source link

]]> 0
Miami woman pleads guilty to threatening to kill Vice President Kamala Harris Wed, 15 Sep 2021 10:56:38 +0000

MIAMI, Fla. / CNN – A nurse in South Florida has pleaded guilty to threatening to kill Vice President Kamala Harris, Department of Justice officials have said.

Niviane Petit Phelps, 39, pleaded guilty on Friday to an indictment of six counts including charges of threats against the vice president. The woman is to be sentenced on November 19. She could spend up to five years in federal prison.

At a plea hearing, Phelps admitted that she sent her husband, who was in jail, a 30-second video of herself threatening to kill Harris in February.

The video shows Phelps making threats and shouting curses, prosecutors said. She claimed she accepted $ 53,000 to complete the “coup” against Harris within 50 days, the Justice Department said.

After submitting these videos, Phelps uploaded a photo of herself holding a gun with a target foil at a shooting range. Two days later, Phelps applied for a concealed weapon license, prosecutors said.

Phelps also admitted to telling law enforcement officers who handled this case that if they hadn’t come to her house, she didn’t know what would have happened.

Phelps’ attorney, Scott B. Saul, argued that his client “is adamant that she was letting off steam as she went through a tumultuous time in her life and had never had it. ‘intention to carry out his threats.’

He added that “it has been important for Ms Phelps to demonstrate her acceptance of responsibility as she begins to atone for her aberrant actions”, but that she “plans to demonstrate significant mitigating circumstances” with the aim of obtain a “fair” sentence from the judge handling his case.

The-CNN-Wire ™ & © 2021 Cable News Network, Inc., a WarnerMedia Company. All rights reserved.

Source link

]]> 0
Fake Crypto News Kamala Harris Campaign Alumni Argue Dumbest Story of the Month Tue, 14 Sep 2021 02:00:23 +0000

Two stories – one fake, one painfully real – aired in dotted lines on Monday morning. Two stories, so bafflingly stupid in their content, that it’s hard to tell which one would win (or lose?) In a contest to decide which is the dumbest story of the day.

In one corner, fake news was accidentally picked up by serious news outlets and created a crypto mini-bubble in the process. In another, a group of policy consultants turned to a highly specialized, trendy business consulting brand that feels ripped off Veep. We just can’t resist diving into both.

Dumb and even dumber

Let’s set the scene. Early Monday morning, GlobeNewswire sent out a press release announcing that Walmart had entered into a partnership with litecoin, a little-known cryptocurrency. Soon after, legitimate news sources told the story as well, and Litecoin’s value rose. But there’s a catch: the press release was bogus, the partnership was fictional, and now all the journalists look foolish.

  • Reuters, Yahoo Finance and CNBC all took the thread’s comments seriously and published the article without further verification; the Financial Times, however, could not find a corresponding press release on Walmart’s website or Form 8-K on its SEC page.
  • Litecoin, which had a brief spike to $ 300 during the great crypto boom of May 2021, has mostly been trading around $ 175 per coin for most of the summer and opened at $ 183 on Wednesday; after the success of the fake news, that number jumped to $ 233.75, followed by a sharp drop after a series of retractions.

Walmart quickly denied the story, bringing the embarrassing episode to an end.

Speaking of embarrassing episodes: a group of former Kamala Harris campaign advisers have started a new strategy firm to help CEOs avoid embarrassing episodes. The group, dubbed C Street, is working to prevent CEOs from being “canceled” and hopes to help companies navigate the difficult waters of so-called “waking capitalism.”

The general merits, pitfalls, and realities of cancellation culture are all in the eye of the beholder. But one thing’s for sure: is there an easier way to get the hang of it than to call the anti-cancellation crisis management company?

Source link

]]> 0
Biden to start full day of 9/11 commemorative events at Ground Zero Sat, 11 Sep 2021 08:30:06 +0000

WASHINGTON – President Joe Biden had planned to visit the three sites of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on Saturday as the nation marked the 20th anniversary of the day.

“To the families of the 2,977 people from over 90 nations killed on September 11, 2001 in New York City, Arlington, Virginia and Shanksville, Pa., And the thousands more who were injured, America will commemorate you and your loved ones, ”Biden said in a video posted Friday.

The president was scheduled to start the day in New York City, attending a memorial event at Ground Zero on Saturday morning with First Lady Jill Biden and former President Barack Obama. He was to travel by the Flight 93 memorial in Shanksville, where former President George W. Bush was scheduled to speak, before heading to the Pentagon, participating in wreath-laying ceremonies at both locations.

Biden marked the milestone anniversary, his first as president, weeks after the Taliban took control of Afghanistan, nearly two decades after the United States ousted them from power in the wake of the terrorist attacks. September 11th.

In April, Biden had set that date this year as the deadline for the full U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan – recently acknowledging that he did not foresee a quick Taliban takeover that would return them to power by then.

It wasn’t the only thorny challenge Biden faced in the weeks leading up to the anniversary. As the day approaches, a group of 1,800 family members of 9/11 victims and first responders said they would oppose Biden’s participation in any anniversary event unless he declassified the documents. they were looking for as part of the relevant FBI attack planning investigations.

Biden signed an executive order on Friday granting their request to release documents they said could show a link between the Saudi leadership and the attacks. Biden ordered the documents to be released over the next six months, unless there is a clear national security rationale to keep them classified.

“As the 20th anniversary of September 11 approaches, the American people deserve to have a more complete picture of what their government knows about these attacks,” he said in a statement last week.

Biden, who is no stranger to loss, has assumed the role of chief comforter throughout his presidency. He held a candle lighting ceremony marking 500,000 Covid deaths in February and delivered a prime time speech to the nation to mark a year of lockdown.

His Saturday itinerary recalls how some of his predecessors over the past 20 years marked other milestone anniversaries of the day of national mourning.

On the first anniversary of the attacks, Bush made remarks at the Pentagon, visited a memorial service in Shanksville, then gave a speech that evening with the Statue of Liberty in the background, visiting again on the three sites on the occasion of the fifth anniversary of this day. .

On the 10-year mark, Obama also made stops at all three sites, speaking at Ground Zero. Biden, then vice president, spoke to the Pentagon about his empathy for those who lost loved ones that day. “I know what it’s like to receive this call out of the blue, that the most expensive thing in your life is gone,” he said at the time.

On Friday, Biden again stressed the pain of the loss suffered that day.

“It’s so difficult whether it’s the first year or the 20th,” he said. “… No matter how much time has passed, these commemorations bring everything back painfully as if you just heard the news a few seconds ago.”

Source link

]]> 0
Connecticut Democrats Won’t Defend All Constitutional Rights | Chris Powell Sat, 11 Sep 2021 08:00:00 +0000

Responding to Texas’ new law severely restricting abortion, Democratic Connecticut state president Nancy DiNardo last week tried to piss off the party base. “Connecticut,” she said, “will never allow the activist Supreme Court to deny women in our state reproductive rights.”

Texan law is bizarre, so strategically formulated. Its application is attributed to civil lawsuits brought by individuals against abortion providers and facilitators. Successful plaintiffs can claim a premium of $ 10,000 from each defendant. For procedural reasons, the Supreme Court has denied early intervention against the law, suggesting that the court’s new Conservative majority may consider overturning the court’s abortion precedent, the 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade.

There is nothing new to say about the abortion itself. But his politics will always produce new material – as DiNardo did last week. Because a Supreme Court that would reject Roe and send the abortion law back to the states would be no more “activist” than the Supreme Court that issued Roe and removed the states issue, where it had rested since the founding of the country.

Even liberal legal experts – including late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg – have recognized that regardless of abortion policy that should be, Roe was legally unhealthy or a fat stretch at best. That is, Roe was the product of an “activist” Supreme Court.

DiNardo’s premise and goal is hysteria. Because the Supreme Court will not “take away the reproductive rights of women in our state”, because the Court does not have the power to do so. The power of the court here is only to decide whether abortion is a federal constitutional right, a right in every state.

Additionally, Connecticut has a long permissive abortion law and public opinion here seems unlikely to change the law much, although most residents of the state are likely would have favor requiring parental or guardian approval for underage abortions.

Last week, DiNardo and all other leading Connecticut Democrats ignored a chance to defend a constitutional right far more established than abortion. Although neither the federal nor the state constitution mentions abortion, both guarantee the right to own a firearm. Even more explicit than the Second Amendment to the Federal Constitution, the Connecticut Constitution says, “Every citizen has the right to bear arms in self-defense and the state.

A gun rights group, the Connecticut Citizens Defense League, has filed a federal lawsuit against police chiefs in Hartford, Bridgeport, New Haven and Waterbury for refusing to process gun license applications municipal fireworks, without which people cannot get state permits. The lawsuit details how candidates in cities have been stranded for many months, if not indefinitely.

The cities have not denied their obstruction of this constitutional right. New Haven Mayor Justin Elicker basically admitted it, noting the frequent gun crimes in his city as if it nullifies a constitutional right. Acting New Haven Police Chief Renee Dominguez dishonestly blamed the lockdown on the virus outbreak.

Mayor Elicker was demagogic. “My priorities are to ensure the safety of our residents, not to benefit retailers and gun manufacturers,” said the mayor.

But cities are not sued by gun manufacturers and retailers, but by their own residents. Some may have noticed the social disintegration all around them and the government is the cause. These residents may think they should protect themselves because the government will not.

The Connecticut political establishment views abortion as a good right and gun ownership as a bad one. For the political establishment, this makes constitutions themselves dispensable.

* * *

EXPOSE HIDDEN COTS: Connecticut Attorney General William Tong is urging the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority to cut Eversource Energy’s electricity rates. Perhaps this should be done, but only after determining and making public the amount of the electricity bills that hide the social policy costs of the state government.

If only the state government had an agency to audit its own costs comprehensively. Auditors don’t do that. Yes, Connecticut’s electricity rates are nearly the highest in the country, but so are Connecticut taxes, and state residents pay a lot more for the government than they do for electricity.

Chris Powell is a columnist for the Journal Inquirer.

]]> 0
Texas Republicans quietly cut penalties for honest voting errors Sat, 11 Sep 2021 04:07:30 +0000 Republican priority voting reforms and restrictions signed last week added a number of new election-related offenses and increased criminal penalties for others, all of which have been hotly debated this summer.

But one of these major provisions has received little attention.

The bill lowered the criminal offense for illegal voting from a second degree felony to a class A felony, the latter punishable by up to one year in prison.

It also made a slight change to require that a person accused of illegal voting does so either “knowingly”, as the law currently states, or “intentionally”.

The provisions could impact ongoing cases that have ignited debate over the bill, including that of Crystal Mason, a Black Fort Worth woman who faces five years in state prison for illegally filing a ballot. provisional vote – which was never counted – although she said she had not. to know that she was not entitled to vote.

In another high-profile case that could be affected, Hervis Rogers, a black man from Houston this year, has been charged with illegal voting after making national headlines for his six-hour wait in line in the primary election of 2020.

The ACLU, whose attorneys among other members of the legal team represent both Mason and Rogers, could not be reached for comment.

The illegal voting offense accounts for nearly half of the Texas Attorney General’s office pending voter fraud cases, around 20, though most are linked to an alleged illegal voting system in a mayoral election Edinburgh in 2017. The office also did not respond to a request. for comment.

The changes came from an amendment by State Representative Steve Allison, R-San Antonio, on the House floor in late August. Allison was not available for an interview, but her chief of staff, Rocky Gage, said Allison wanted to make sure people who accidentally vote illegally were not charged. The amendment was not designed specifically with Mason’s case in mind, Gage said, but rather to solve the general problem.

“The main reason for tabling this document – Rep. Allison, he and other members thought it was important to establish that ‘intention’,” Gage said. “There is a lot of talk – (the state representative) Diego Bernal, for example, said:” If I help my grandmother, and I don’t know (it’s illegal), now I have troubles. So we thought to address these concerns – there is a need to address these concerns.

“I think the members understood this was important,” Gage said.

Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan, who is a founding member of the bipartisan House Criminal Justice Reform Caucus, said the provision was part of the legislature’s “holistic approach to advancing the integrity of elections “which struck” the appropriate balance between access to the ballot and accountability “.

Lowering the sentence will protect voters who make innocent mistakes and help state lawyers stay focused on the few really bad actors, said C. Robert Heath, an election lawyer who served under the Democratic attorney general from Texas John Hill in the 1970s.

“Laws are more easily enforced when they are more reasonable,” said Heath. “Most of the people who vote illegally, and I don’t think there are very many, do so because they are confused or don’t understand the law.”

Regardless of the sanction, Heath said there was a reason cases of voter fraud were so rare.

“Whether it’s a misdemeanor or a felony, it’s high risk and low reward,” he said. “If you want to change the result, this is a very unusual situation, and a vote will not do it. You’re going to need a lot of votes.

Still, some Republicans say any sanctions relief in the Election Code is a mistake. Among them is Andrew Eller, a 25-year-old election judge in Bell County, who has argued for tougher penalties for judges who refuse poll observers.

“I think tougher penalties are always the best for illegal voting,” Eller said in an interview on Friday. “When a person votes illegally, they withdraw someone else’s legal vote. If you do it knowingly, that should be a higher standard.

Mason’s case was at one point a sticking point between the Texas House and the Senate. The bill was one step away from passage if the Senate were to accept the House’s changes, but the bill’s author, Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola, said he was not agree with a House amendment intended to clarify the law in cases like Mason’s.

The amendment, a bipartisan effort by Representatives Briscoe Cain, R-Deer Park, and John Bucy III, D-Austin, would have clarified that a person must not only know the circumstances that made him or her ineligible, but also that those circumstances applied to her. .

The Fort Worth Court of Appeal, in affirming Mason’s conviction, argued that the state had only to prove that she had voted while knowing the condition that made her ineligible: that she was in federal probation at the time.

A conference committee made up of members from both houses was convened with instructions from Hughes to withdraw the amendment and did so. Neither Hughes nor House author, Representative Andrew Murr, R-Junction, responded to a request for comment.

The House then passed a resolution, a formal expression of opinion that does not have the force of law, that said members oppose prosecution of Texans who mistakenly vote without knowing they are ineligible. Phelan noted that the resolution “was passed by an overwhelming majority.”

Chuck DeVore, vice president of national initiatives at the right-wing Texas Public Policy Foundation, said that while the organization has not taken a specific position on this provision, it supports another part of Senate Bill 1 that obliges the courts to inform criminals. of their right to vote in the event of conviction. Mason was on probation and Rogers was on parole when they tried to vote.

“It’s no shock to me because I don’t think a lot of people, frankly, want to see these very rare cases prosecuted,” DeVore said, referring to cases involving voters making honest mistakes.

DeVore pointed to data from the Attorney General’s office which shows that only four cases over 16 years involved a voter who was not eligible to vote.

“The impression was that members of both parties weren’t really enthusiastic about this kind of punishment,” he said.

One of the main priorities of Republicans this session was a section creating a specific criminal sanction for harvesting votes, illegally forcing people to vote in a certain way in return for compensation or some other benefit. , which is now a third degree felony.

DeVore added that, combined with this provision, reducing the offense of “illegal voting” makes sense.

“You want to sue the people who actually run these programs, rather than the people who have been brought in as, in many cases, ‘dupes’ to participate,” DeVore said. “I’m not particularly concerned about the 20 people who end up in one of these schemes and who each get $ 10.”

Source link

]]> 0
letter: republicans want autocracy | Opinion letters Wed, 08 Sep 2021 10:15:00 +0000

After the “9-11” tragedy, America and Partners sued Bin Laden in Afghanistan. In “2003” “W” took a left turn to introduce Iraq with all the strength and fury of the US military; it was the war that should never have been. If we had hit Afghanistan with the same intensity, we would have come out in three to five years and today the country would be free. Every president from Bush to Biden has reaffirmed that a day will come when we will leave. Trump and Pompeo negotiated the “withdrawal” with the Taliban and went snooker, but their efforts were approved by the GOP. No one could have predicted the rapid collapse of the Afghan military and these same Republicans now disparage Biden for the way things turned out, however, having remained completely silent when Trump abandoned the Kurds in a rapid withdrawal and unexpected from US forces. Regardless of who had been president, the Afghan exit would have gone badly under the circumstances.

When things go well, Republicans take credit for it and when they do badly, they blame Democrats in general and the President in particular. There is nothing “Grand Old Party” anymore. They haven’t had any original ideas or done anything for the American people since the presidency of HW Bush who represented all Americans and for whom I voted twice. During the HW presidency, Democrats and Republicans called themselves “worthy opposition.” The Republican Party has swayed more and more to the right since the advent of Newt Gingrich. Besides tax cuts for the rich, what have they done for America? They will gerrymander, they will pass a voter suppression law, and do whatever they can to turn America into a one-party autocracy.

Source link

]]> 0
Nobel laureate and senior Democratic economist Stiglitz says Fed’s Powell should leave Wed, 08 Sep 2021 10:04:00 +0000

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – In order for US President Joe Biden to stick to his agenda, he shouldn’t be re-appointing Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve chairman, said Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel Prize-winning economist and longtime Democratic adviser , in an interview that pleaded in favor of a remake. from the management of the Fed.

FILE PHOTO: Columbia University professor Joseph Stiglitz speaks at the China Development Forum in Beijing, China March 24, 2019. REUTERS / Thomas Peter / Pool / File Photo

“People have praised Powell a lot for supporting the economy during the pandemic… On the one hand, I agree with that,” Stiglitz, now a professor at Columbia University, said during a telephone interview with Reuters on Friday.

“On the other hand, it is the bare minimum for a qualification. Almost any reasonable person would have done something similar, ”Stiglitz said of the near zero interest rates and monthly bond purchases Powell has maintained since March 2020.

Rather, Biden should examine Powell’s softer approach to financial regulation, his reluctance to incorporate climate-related issues into the Fed’s banking supervision, and check his “gut instinct” as to whether Powell would also be attached to the Fed. full employment if inflation remains higher than expected.

“Is the Biden administration going to fulfill what is at the heart of its agenda? … It shouldn’t be Powell,” Stiglitz said, calling current Fed Governor Lael Brainard an “obvious candidate” , which would take a stronger position. regulatory position, push the Fed to take better account of climate risks and undoubtedly tolerate more inflation risk in order to generate more jobs.

Stiglitz said he has yet to speak to members of the administration about his point of view but will “likely engage” as the debate over Fed appointments continues.

His comments, as the former head of President Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers, former World Bank chief economist and 2001 Nobel Laureate in Economics, add a weighty voice to a debate that has pitted the stability represented by Powell calls for using what could represent up to four open seats on the board of directors of seven members of the Fed to reshuffle the US central bank.

Powell’s four-year term as president ends in February. Some Biden supporters who are following the Fed more closely have argued that he should get a second term to complete a policy change that puts more weight on the job boost and further courts the risk of inflation for the country. to do.

He is also favored for a rollover by market participants, including some who argue it would be risky to make him a lame duck from the Fed as the central bank navigates a noticeable shift towards post-pandemic monetary policy. .

The matter is under active discussion, but Biden has not made a final decision and White House press secretary Jen Psaki declined to comment on the president’s schedule on Tuesday. Some progressive voices in the president’s Democratic Party have said that extending the tenure of one of those appointed by former Republican President Donald Trump with close ties to the private equity world would be a missed opportunity.


Any change could spark a tough battle for confirmation in the equally divided US Senate. At the same time, key Democratic figures like Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren and Ohio Democrat Sherrod Brown, chair of the Senate Banking Committee, have so far denied any public approval from Powell.

Climate change and financial regulation are at the heart of the arguments against it.

“Financial stability requires dealing with the mispricing of assets’ likely to be affected by extreme weather events or to be ‘stranded’ as global energy choices change, said Stiglitz. “If there is a risk of bad pricing, it must be included” in the stress tests and regulations applied to banks.

Powell said the primary response to climate change must be defined by America’s elected leaders. When pushed by lawmakers, he characterized the Fed’s climate work as more focused on its impact on long-term economic performance, and did not embrace liberal calls to impose capital requirements. more stringent associated with climate risk as part of the Fed’s “short-term stress”. tests ”which assess how bank portfolios react to economic shocks.

Tackling climate change has been a central goal of the Biden administration, and Stiglitz argued he should embrace these and other values ​​he campaigned on.

Stiglitz called Clinton’s reappointment of then Fed Chairman and Republican Alan Greenspan as, ultimately, flawed – promoting stability and bipartisanship, but allowing Greenspan’s confidence in the markets and an approach. more passive regulation set the stage for the Internet stock market bubble and and a more serious housing market crash.

Perhaps the weakest argument for Powell, Stiglitz argued, is that he represents the path of least resistance.

“No one wants to disrupt the financial markets … There is a political appeal in not rocking the boat,” he said. “But in my opinion, we made a big mistake in renaming Greenspan … I hope Biden doesn’t do the same.”

Reporting by Howard Schneider; Additional reports by Nandita Bose; Editing by Andrea Ricci

]]> 0
Ron DeSantis Dubs 2024 Run ‘Nonsense’ As Poll Shows Joe Biden Would Cheat On Him Wed, 08 Sep 2021 09:01:43 +0000

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has dismissed speculation about a presidential bid, though a recent poll showed he would be comfortably beaten either way in a hypothetical face-to-face with President Joe Biden in 2024. .

At a press conference to promote the opening of a monoclonal antibody treatment center in St Cloud, Osceola County, DeSantis tried to push back rumors of a White House offer, telling the reporters that “all speculation about me is purely fabricated.”

“I’m just doing my job,” he said on Tuesday, “you know, we work hard. Obviously our state has led on a lot of things, including this, and now other states are copying us. “

“I hear all of this and honestly it’s nonsense so I don’t really know what to say to the rumors,” he added, before answering another question.

His comments are unlikely to dispel speculation about a White House run in 2024, especially since he’s set to headline an event in Nebraska City on Sunday to celebrate farming with d ‘other potential GOP candidates.

A split image shows Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (left) and President Joe Biden. DeSantis has dismissed speculation he would run for the White House in 2024, although a poll shows he would lose to Biden.

DeSantis will be speaking at Gov. Pete Ricketts’ event at Arbor Lodge Historical Park with former Vice President Mike Pence and Texas Senator Ted Cruz, Fox News reported.

A straw poll in July of attendees at the Conservative Political Action Conference showed GOP voters ranked DeSantis second behind former President Donald Trump for the Republican nomination while, when Trump was not on the ballot, DeSantis came first.

DeSantis even managed to beat Trump in a 2024 straw poll at the Western Conservative Summit a month earlier and the former president said in April he would “definitely” consider the Florida governor as his running mate. .

But an Emerson College poll this month showed DeSantis would be significantly behind Biden if he was on the GOP ticket against the Democratic incumbent.

When asked about a series of potential confrontations, voters said Biden would beat DeSantis by 12 percentage points, from 48% to 36%.

Meanwhile, the survey conducted on Aug.31 and Sept.1 with a 2.7% margin of error said that a Trump-Biden contest would give the former GOP chairman a slight lead, from 47% to 46%.

The results suggest that “Republicans want either Trump or a Trumpian candidate” to lead the 2024 GOP ticket, said Spencer Kimball, director of Emerson College Polling.

However, DeSantis, who has aligned himself with Trump and opposed the Biden administration’s policies on pandemic mitigation measures, faces a drop in popularity in his own state as cases of COVID-19, hospitalizations and deaths are increasing.

A Morning Consult poll at the end of August found that nearly half (48%) of Sunshine State voters disapproved of his performance at work, an eight percent increase since July 1.

News week contacted the DeSantis office for comment.

This story has been updated with a new image.

Source link

]]> 0