The sudden concern of Senate Republicans for misdemeanors

“I guess Rachael Rollins is too dynamic for these old men.”

One of the most serious crimes in recent years has been the January 6 insurgency in the United States Capitol to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. The House of Representatives has set up a select committee to investigate this organized aggression in order to prevent further attacks. The main power of the committee is to convict of criminal contempt those who refuse to comply with their subpoena and testify. Stephen K. Bannon, an associate of former President Donald Trump, refused to comply with the subpoena.

The House vote on Bannon’s refusal was 229 to 202, with just nine Republicans voting to enforce compliance. The constitutional question at stake is whether Congress will have the power to restrain the president’s excesses. It is very unusual to see politicians willfully diminish their own authority.

For example, some Republican senators have decided to deviate from the usual voice vote for approval of President-appointed U.S. attorneys to challenge Biden’s selection of Suffolk County Attorney Rachael Rollins. They oppose its strategy of not prosecuting a number of petty crimes in order to allow its staff to work on more serious crimes.

So now our US Republican senators are more concerned with “intrusion, disturbing the peace, and disorderly conduct” rather than proper limits on the president’s power. Republicans have yet to condemn the fraudulent claim that the 2020 presidential election was rigged.

House of Representatives, Jan 6, Senate Republicans, Stephen K. Bannon, Trump

About Therese Williams

Check Also

Republicans ‘are fascists’ because of their pro-life stance, MSNBC’s ‘Cross Connection’ guest emphatically claims

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! A debate about how fascist Republicans interfered …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.