Vice President Kamala Harris will discuss California’s wildfire recovery efforts during a joint visit with Tom Vilsack to San Bernardino on Friday

SAN BERNARDINO, Calif. (KABC) – Vice President Kamala Harris will travel to San Bernardino on Friday afternoon for a joint visit with Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to discuss growing efforts to fight wildfires in the whole state.

The two are set to announce the awarding of $1.3 billion in disaster relief funds for the US Forest Service, including $600 million for California.

This funding from the recently passed federal infrastructure bill will help states impacted by wildfires and hurricanes in 2021 and will go toward hazmat cleanup efforts, reforestation, watershed restoration and repair. infrastructures.

The Biden administration said Tuesday it will dramatically expand its efforts to stave off these catastrophic wildfires that have scorched parts of the West by more aggressively clearing forests around “hotspots” where nature and neighborhoods clash.

Administration officials said they have developed a $50 billion plan to more than double the use of controlled fires and logging to reduce trees and other vegetation that serve as tinder in the worst areas. more at risk.

Only part of the work has been funded so far.

Projects will begin this year and the plan will focus on areas where out-of-control fires have wiped out neighborhoods and sometimes entire communities – including the Sierra Nevada mountains in California, the east side of the Rocky Mountains in Colorado and parts of Arizona, Oregon and Washington State.

Homes continue to be built in fire-prone areas, even as the conditions that fueled the fires worsen.

“You’re going to have forest fires. The question is how catastrophic those fires must be,” the agriculture ministry said. Tom Vilsack told The Associated Press in an interview. “The time to act is now if we ultimately want to change the trajectory of these fires over time.”

Specific plans weren’t immediately released, and it’s unclear who would pay for all of the planned work on nearly 80,000 square miles (200,000 square kilometers) – an area almost as large as Idaho. . Much of this area is controlled by states, tribes or is owned by private interests.

Achieving that goal would require about $20 billion over 10 years for work on national forests and $30 billion for work on other federal, state, tribal and private lands, said Vilsack spokeswoman Kate. Waters.

Vilsack acknowledged that the new effort will also require a “paradigm shift” within the U.S. Forest Service, from an agency dedicated to eradicating wildfires, to one that uses what some Native Americans call “good fire” on forests and rangelands to prevent even larger outbreaks.

Forest Service planning documents say work will focus on “hot spots” that make up only 10% of fire-prone areas in the United States, but represent 80% of the risk to communities because of their fire densities. population and their location.

The recently passed federal infrastructure bill put a down payment on the initiative — about $3 billion over five years that Vilsack says will get work moving quickly.

Wildfire expert John Abatzoglou said reducing fire danger on the amount of land envisioned under the administration’s plan is a “lofty goal” that represents even more area than that burned in the past. over the past 10 years in the West. But Abatzoglou, an engineering professor at the University of California, Merced, said the focus on wildfire hazards closest to communities made sense.

“Our dashboard for fires should be about lives saved rather than acres that haven’t burned,” he said.

Vilsack joined Forest Service Chief Randy Moore in announcing the plan at an event in Phoenix where he defended its scope as realistic.

“We know from a scientific perspective precisely where this action needs to take place in many of these forests in order to protect communities, in order to protect people,” Vilsack said following the announcement at the Desert Botanical Garden. , a popular showcase for cacti, desert trees and other dry weather plants.

Dealing with western wildfires is becoming more urgent as they grow more destructive and intense. There have been rare winter fires in recent weeks, including infernos in Montana and Colorado, where a December 30 wildfire ripped through a suburban area and destroyed more than 1,000 buildings, killing one and a second still missing.

And there are no signs of letting up in conditions that keep the risk of wildfires extremely high. A long-term ‘mega-drought’ is gripping the region and scientists predict temperatures will continue to rise as more climate-altering carbon emissions are pumped into the atmosphere .

The impact extends far beyond the western United States, as massive smoke plumes at the height of wildfire season in the United States and Canada spread health effects to across North America – sending unhealthy pollution last summer across major cities from San Francisco to Philadelphia and Toronto.

For decades, the main approach to containing and extinguishing wildfires has been to try to eradicate them. The efforts have been similar to massive military-style campaigns, including planes, fleets of heavy equipment and thousands of firefighters and support workers dispatched to blaze zones.

However, fires are part of the natural cycle of most forests, so put out stands of unburning trees surrounded by dead wood, undergrowth and other highly flammable combustibles – a worst-case scenario when fires ignite.

Critics say the government’s plan to use logging to reduce fire damage will harm both forests and the wildlife and water supplies that depend on them. In South Dakota’s Black Hills, for example, government biologists have said too many trees dying from a combination of insects, fires and logging have made current levels of timber harvesting unsustainable. .

“The US Forest Service simply cannot pull itself out of the climate crisis,” said Adam Rissien of the environmental group WildEarth Guardians.

But Vilsack said a combination of tree thinning and intentional fires to clear undergrowth, called prescribed burns, would make forests healthier in the long term while reducing the threat to public safety.

Thinning forests near Lake Tahoe and its tourist community of South Lake Tahoe have been credited with slowing the advance of last summer’s massive Caldor Fire that destroyed nearly 800 homes and prompted the evacuation of tens of thousands of residents and tourists.

A similar phenomenon occurred during the Bootleg Fire in Oregon last July, which burned more than 1,500 square kilometers but caused less damage in forest that has been thinned over the past decade. .

“We know it works,” Vilsack said. “It’s about removing some of the wood, in a very scientific and thoughtful way, so that ultimately the fires don’t just keep jumping from treetop to treetop, but end up get to the ground where we can put them out.”

___

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2022 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.

About Therese Williams

Check Also

As Biden drags on student loan forgiveness, Dems grow increasingly frustrated

White House chief of staff Ron Klain and a deputy director of the National Economic …